| WORLD | USA | COMMENTARY | WORK & MONEY | LEARNING | LIVING | SCI / TECH | A & E | TRAVEL | BOOKS | THE HOME FORUM | ||||||||||||
| Home | About Us/Help | Archive | Subscribe | Feedback | Text Edition | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Category: Digital An earful from audiophilesBy csmonitor.com staffWe knew audiophiles were passionate and detail-oriented. And we were not surprised that many of them weighed in double forte on our story last week on sound quality and digital formats. The main message from nearly all of them: We’re glad someone’s paying attention. "Nice to see the grievances of audio dorks like me getting public exposure," wrote Ethan Cheng, of Chicago. "Thank you for the article on digital music formats," wrote Sam Grubb, of Salem, Ore. "I have resisted all the iPod type devices exactly because I have not been willing to sacrifice sound quality." Then we got an earful on some arcane but important points. Following are excerpts from several astute e-mailers regarding, in particular, our misclassification of the WAV format – and touching on some other issues. We value the clarifications and appreciate that they took the time to write, and then helped us get in tune.
If you’d like to advance the discussion even further, write to us at Weekend Zone. by Clayton Collins December 7, 2006 in Digital | By csmonitor.com staff | Permalink |
ApparelBuy Shoes Business ResourcesWebsite SEO Services FinancialGiftsGraphic DesignHome & GardenLegal ServicesPre-Screened Lawyers Real EstateHome Loans Self StorageTravelWeb ServicesCheap Web Hosting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | About Us/Help | Feedback | Subscribe | Archive | Print Edition | Site Map | RSS | Special Projects | Corrections | ||||
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Rights & Permissions | Advertise With Us | Today's Article on Christian Science | ||||
|
www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2006 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved. | ||||