![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| WORLD | USA | COMMENTARY | WORK & MONEY | LEARNING | LIVING | SCI / TECH | A & E | TRAVEL | BOOKS | THE HOME FORUM | ||||||||||||
|
Home |
About Us/Help |
Archive |
Subscribe |
Feedback |
Text Edition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commentary > ScitechBlog
ScitechBlog: The impact of science and technology on our lives.
« Trendsetting tech elite choose the 'red pill' | ScitechBlog Home | MoveOn sets the pace of Internet activism » Diebold backs down in e-voting case
| csmonitor.com
by Tom Regan Internetnews.com reports that e-voting machine manufacturer Diebold has agreed to withdraw its cease-and-desist orders against privacy groups and several ISPs that had hosted or linked to sites that published internal e-mails discussing problems with e-voting technology. "This is a huge victory that shows we have weapons on our side to protect free speech from overbearing copyright laws so that the Internet remains a forum for public discussion," said Electronic Freedom Foundation staff attorney Wendy Seltzer. One of the people providing links to the Diebold e-mails is U.S. congressional representative Dennis Kucinich. Mr. Kucinich, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, says he wants a Congressional inquiry to be held into the actions of Diebold. "Diebold's actions are representative of a growing body of abuses through which large and powerful parties unfairly intimidate ISPs to remove information those parties do not like," Kucinich wrote in a letter dated Nov. 21. "Powerful parties should not be permitted to misuse copyright as a tool for limiting bad press and barring access to legitimate consumer information." December 2, 2003 in Intellectual property | Permalink |
Sponsored Links
|
| Home | About Us/Help | Feedback | Subscribe | Archive | Print Edition | Site Map | Special Projects | Corrections | ||||
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Rights & Permissions | Terms of Service | | Advertise With Us | Today's Article on Christian Science | ||||
| www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2007 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved. |
||||