| WORLD | USA | COMMENTARY | WORK & MONEY | LEARNING | LIVING | SCI / TECH | A & E | TRAVEL | BOOKS | THE HOME FORUM | ||||||||||||
| Home | About Us/Help | Archive | Subscribe | Feedback | Text Edition | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Category: Connecting From Baghdad with loveBy csmonitor.com staffBy Howard LaFranchi - Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor Before I left my home in Maryland for a month of reporting in Iraq, I asked my three children to send a greeting to the three daughters of our Baghdad bureau’s driver, whom I got to know during an earlier stint. The two younger children sent nice drawings and "hello from America," but my 14-year-old son sent a longer letter. One sentence in it surprised me: "I’m sorry about what’s happening in your country," he wrote, "but I hope it will be better soon." That simple sentiment from one kid to others he didn’t know has come back to me repeatedly as I’ve met with dozens of Iraqis in formal interviews and in chance encounters on the streets. The gratitude felt by most Iraqis for the removal of Saddam Hussein remains, but has been offset in many ways by the country’s deteriorating security situation. Violence that before was hidden in the hated regime’s torture chambers and killing fields has been replaced by a more public and indiscriminate variety. Increasingly, Iraqis blame America for this violence – after all, it didn’t exist before the Americans came – tempting more of them to wish US soldiers would go away. That sense of American responsibility for Iraq’s deterioration trickled down to a 14-year-old in Maryland who felt compelled to say “sorry” for the state of affairs. How can America address the current slide, in which it keep getting more blame for the bad and less credit for the good? One way, some Iraqis suggest, is for the US to set a date for the departure of its troops, and stick to it. Get through January’s planned elections – which most Iraqis look forward to, despite the risks, as the country’s first-ever democratic elections – declare “mission accomplished” so that American blood and treasure will not have been expended in vain, and go. It may fall short of an idealistic picture of a free and prosperous Iraq as model for the entire Middle East, but it will be an accomplishment, if a more realistic one. Iraqis seem to understand there are risks to this scenario. What if, without the prop of the US military, the country’s factions are unable to get along and sink into more bloodshed, possibly even civil war? Some Iraqis say that won’t happen because their countrymen and women want a strong nation, and they understand that in the modern world a country divided among factions – or even split up into several smaller countries – would certainly be weaker. People talk about Israel wanting a weak Iraq, but they also say that most of Iraq’s other neighbors also prefer something weak next door, if not in destabilizing turmoil. I asked my driver what he thought of all this discussion, what he thought the Americans should do to turn "sorry" to "you’re welcome" and end this experience as Iraqis’ friends. And what about the risk of Iraq collapsing into Iraqi-on-Iraqi war? That may seem naive to some, yet it carried a certain hopeful wisdom. As did a letter he brought from his daughters for me to take home to my children. (One side is in English, the other in the original Arabic, in script that will amaze them). September 29, 2004 in Connecting | By csmonitor.com staff | Permalink |
ApparelBuy Shoes Business ResourcesWebsite SEO Services FinancialGiftsGraphic DesignHome & GardenLegal ServicesPre-Screened Lawyers Real EstateHome Loans Self StorageTravelWeb ServicesCheap Web Hosting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | About Us/Help | Feedback | Subscribe | Archive | Print Edition | Site Map | RSS | Special Projects | Corrections | ||||
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Rights & Permissions | Advertise With Us | Today's Article on Christian Science | ||||
|
www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2006 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved. | ||||