|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Our staff takes you behind the scene of DNC/RNC.

|
|
Posted September 02, 2004
An old debt repaid, again and again
On the last night of the Republican National Convention, I left Madison Square Garden and went outside to gauge the mood on the streets. It was easy to see that the tension from Tuesday night had returned.
As I walked just outside the Garden, a police captain with a bullhorn started yelling at a group of about five protesters, and told them that if they wanted to protest, they had to go to the designated protest area on 9th Ave. Four of them started to move in the direction indicated, but one of the protesters started to walk in the other direction. [It's important to note here that lots of other people were moving in the same "other" direction at the same time.] The police captain yelled even more at the young man. Then the police captain roughly pushed a barricade out of the way and moved aggresively towards the young man.
Suddenly 50 other cops appeared out of nowhere. The young protester had literally not moved an inch since the captain had yelled at him the second time. He hadn't raised his hands, or made ANY kind of threatening gesture. It was totally the reaction of the police captain that the police themselves had reacted to. You would have thought the young man had pulled a rocket-propelled grenade from his backpack.
The young man just smiled, shrugged and moved in the direction that the captain had indicated. He probably didn't need to aggravate the police in the first place, but the reaction to his decision to "disperse" in the wrong direction was, in my view, WAY out of proportion.
That's when I saw her crossing the street. It was the picture that she carried that captured my attention. It was a picture of a handsome young man in uniform. Underneath the picture were the numbers "1944 - 1967."
"He was my first love," Clare Englandr told me. We were walking and talking together, since the police had told Clare that she wasn't allowed to stand still. "As if I might do something dangerous," she laughed.
The young man in the picture was Dick Allen. In 1967 he and Clare were dating. Dick received his notice to go to Vietnam.
"We weren't sure what to do. Back then we tended to do what we were told. He didn't want to, but Dick went. Two months after he got there he was shot through the eye."
Clare told me that Dick's death was devastating. She admits she fell apart for a long time. She believes that Dick's mother died of grief at the death of her only son.
"I kept thinking, why didn't I tell him to go to Canada or to do something else? I just couldn't forgive myself for not doing something."
So for the past 30 years, this soft-spoken woman from California had been protesting war. And now she was in New York to protest the war in Iraq.
"I really believe that Bush and Cheney are masters of deception," she told me. "I can't really believe that President Bush believes that God wants him to do this. I really can't. I'm a Quaker. The Bible says blessed are the peacemakers
"I know that Saddam Hussein was not a good person, and I'm not defending him. But war is not the answer."
We walked and talked a bit longer. She told me that she thought the police had done a good job and said several of them had been very nice to her. She also said she was more than a little afraid.
"I don't want to be arrested, but I want to do this."
After I left Clare, I moved up toward 7th Avenue. That where I met Jennifer Roberts, a young woman from New York. She was carrying a sign that said "Report the facts, not the rhetoric."
"This is my third night protesting," she told me. "But this is the first time I've been near the Garden."
So why did she come here tonight, I asked.
"Because George Bush is here. I try to protest whenever he comes to town. I just don't think he's doing a good job."
Like Clare, Jennifer also had good things to say about the police.
"Yea, they've been pretty good. One night we even started chanting 'Give the cops a raise.' "
Jennifer also did not want to be arrested. She wasn't interested in violence. That is why she had not come downtown on Tuesday night, when anarchist groups had said they would create havoc. But she wanted to make sure her voice was heard.
I left Jennifer and wandered more through the crowd. It seemed to me that the protesters gathered tonight were different from the ones I had seen on previous nights. They were older, and looked more determined. It looked as if many of them had come directly to Madison Square Garden from work.
I saw Clare once more. Then the police "locked down" the streets around the Garden and I was pushed up toward Times Square.
I saw Jennifer again on a street corner.
"Don't get arrested," I said to her.
She laughed. " I'll do my best."
And then she and Clare were gone. I hope they're OK.
September 2, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
'Get your Kerry flip-flops'
Not all the young people you meet on the streets near the Republican National Convention in New York are here to protest.
Ian is a College Republican from New Jersey. When I talked to him this afternoon, he was standing in Times Square selling Kerry "flip-flop" T-shirts. [The words "flip-flop" were imposed over a Heinz ketchup label].
"It's been a long haul," Ian told me with a smile. "People have been giving us a pretty hard time. My friend who's with me actually got pushed around this morning. Another guy debated me for an hour." He laughed. " It's pretty cool."
Ian says that the money he makes from selling the T-shirts will go to fund College Republican activities.
"I was here 13 hours yesterday and I've been working since nine o'clock this morning. My feet are killing me. But a lot of the [Republican] Senators and the delegates have been stopping by to tell us what a good job we're doing."
I asked Ian if he wasn't a little concerned to be selling pro-Bush T-shirts in such a Democratic town. "No," he said with a smile. "They wouldn't put me out here if I didn't know what I was doing."
"
Meanwhile, literally just down the block, Carmen, Tiffany, and Joseph are selling Kerry 'flip-flop' flip-flops. Joseph, who designed the sandals, told me his products are "way better" than anything that's being sold in the hotels where the Republicans are staying. "See, it's got Kerry's picture on it. So, everytime you take a step, you walk on his face."
I asked Joseph if he was a Republican. He gave me a sheepish grin. "No. We're all from Boston. I'm just here trying to make some money."
So I said to him. "Wait, according to Arnold [Schwarzenegger], that means you are a Republican."
"Yeah, we thought about that," said Carmen. "But we need the money more."
"Yeah the next thing you know I'll be using sweatshop labor," said Joseph. "After all these sandals do come from Thailand."
As I walked away I could hear the competing yells of "Get your Kerry flip-flops" coming from different ends of the block. Ah, real American entrepreneurial competition at its best.
September 2, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Security goes up another notch
Coming up from Penn Station this morning onto 34 St. and 7th Avenue, it was obvious right away that the level of security, which had already been high, was now even higher. Although I would not have thought it possible, it seemed as if there were even more police patrolling the streets around Madison Square Garden.
Although convention officials say they haven't raised security levels, there are definitely more checkpoints than there were Wednesday. There's little doubt that the two incidents Wednesday, where protesters were able to make their way into the convention center (one of them got to within 30 feet of Vice President Cheney last night) lie behind these new measures. But local law enforcement officials say the GOP has no one to blame but itself for this problem.
It turns out that there are more than a few no shows for the convention, and organizers have been worried about too many empty seats in the Garden, so they've been rather liberal (if you'll pardon the pun) giving out passes to people who say they don't have one. And the delegates who are here have also been giving away their passes when they don't need them.
I had a couple of young people approach me the other day and ask if they could "borrow" my pass, because they just wanted to go inside the Garden just to see what it was like. I don't know if they were protesters or not, but no way, no how, was that going to happen.
It's my guess that word has gone around to various delegations to STOP IT RIGHT NOW!
While most GOP delegates have been really happy with how the convention has unfolded to date (everyody says Arnold's speech has been the best so far), there were a few murmurs of concern after Democratic Senator Zell Miller's speech last night. Several delegates I spoke with early this morning said it was real red meat for the GOP base, but thought it was way too harsh for the moderate and independent votes the GOP seeks.
And it seems the Democrats feel the same way. Joe Lockhart, the former press secretary for President Clinton, was one of several Democratic guests at this morning's Monitor breakfast, and he said Sen. Miller's speech was a "tactical error" by the GOP and would be exploited by the Democrats in the weeks to come.
It brings to mind Pat Buchanan speech from 1992.
There is another potential problem for the Bush campaign that is being talked about by members of the media housed in the old Farley Post Office Building. It seems that former Texas official Ben Barnes is about to go public with how he got President Bush out of having to serve in Vietnam and into the National Guard in the 60s. First place that I saw this mentioned was on Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo blog Wednesday. Marshall says Barnes has kept quiet about what he did for years, but decided to break his silence after the attacks on John Kerry's war record "proved too much for him."
Barnes has apparently taped a long interview with CBS that will air in the near future in which he will "describe the strings he pulled to keep Bush out of Vietnam and apparently more."
Oh my. Personally, I wish we could just drop all this Vietnam stuff. President Bush has already admitted that Kerry served "honorably." But the Swiftboat Veterans ads have changed the calculus. Suddenly things President Bush and Senator Kerry did years ago are being used to judge how they might react to something today.
As I've often said in My American Life, Iraq is not Vietnam. And I, for one, would hate to be judged today on things that I did two or three decades ago in terms of who I am and what I do today.
Then again, maybe that's why I'm not in politics.
September 2, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Posted September 01, 2004
Voices from the streets of New York
Over the past three days, I've spent a lot of time on the streets of New York, talking to people, with the emphasis on police and protesters. And they've got a lot of interesting things to say. Protesters are happy to tell you who they are, while the police will generally only open up if you promise not to use their names. Here is some of what they've been telling me.
Mia comes from California and works with Refuse and Resist, which is a New York-based antiwar group. When I walked up to talk to her Tuesday night, she was passing out "Give 'em the NO" stickers faster than you could give out free tickets to a Red Sox-Yankees game outside Fenway Park in Boston. The group is encouraging as many people as possible to wear the bright orange stickers on Thursday night when President Bush gives his speech at Madison Square Garden. Based on the number I saw her pass out in a ten minute span, a lot of people (not protesters I might add, but local New Yorkers) will be sporting them.
So I figured I would start off our conversation with a direct question.
"Are you a Democrat? Because I keep hearing all the people protesting out here are Democrats."
Well, that made her pause for a moment. She laughed.
"No, I am not a Democrat. I don't see any difference between Kerry and Bush on the issues I care about. If there was a Democratic president, I would be doing the same thing I'm doing right now."
That was an answer, by the way, I heard all night long, from every single protester I talked with, young and old, all over midtown and downtown Manhattan.
So why did you come all the way from California?
"Because it's an important issue. I've been working on these kinds of issues for about ten years and it was important to be here this week."
She was passing out stickers again.
Do you think you're making a difference?
"I don't know," she said without missing a beat. "I think so. You've been standing here for a while, you've seen how many people have taken stickers. Every little bit helps."
My relationship with the police has been mixed this week. After all, I was almost arrested last night as I covered a non-violent protest. I'm still puzzled as to why the police felt it necessary to arrest the people I was covering.
But that aside, I have to say that the police have been pretty good this week. And they've had a pretty hard row to hoe.
One report I saw said that police had been pulled in from every single borough and every single precinct for duty. Over 37,500 police are on duty in New York this week – that's more than half the size of the entire Canadian Armed Forces. And that duty was often 12-14 hours long, standing in the same spot, often without shade in hot, humid weather.
And here's a part of the story that you may have missed: some of the protesters this week are police officers themselves. A group of police protesters have been following Mayor Bloomberg around all week, demanding that he give them a new contract. The entire New York City police force hasn't had one for two years.
Just ask them about it.
"It's my job to be here and I want to be here," one exhausted-looking officer told me, as he leaned against a column in front of a downtown hotel. "But the city is asking a lot of us and not giving us much back. We could have made this really tough on Bloomberg, but we don't work that way. But I'll tell you, once or twice I thought about getting in on a protest myself, just because I'm so p***ed off at the mayor."
The result of this anger is that some police officers are taking the hiring exams for other police departments in communities on Long Island or in New Jersey, where they say the pay is better and the hours shorter.
In a rather revealing interview done for the National Journal Convention Daily (which is being distributed at the convention this week), a reporter watched an older officer ask a group of cadets (who are also working 14-hour shifts this week) how many of them had applied to work for a better-paying suburban department, rather than in New York City.
All of the cadets raised their hands.
My favorite police moment of the week, however, happened during the "Still We Rise" protest march I followed on Monday.
At one point, I stepped out of the procession and onto the sidewalk to get a better view of just how long the march was. As I gazed down the street, I heard the voice of a police officer behind me. I turned to look.
"Yeah, I've been on TV a few times," an officer said matter-of-factly to a very attractive woman. "Normally it's just a picture of me standing at a crime scene or on the edge of a crowd, but I've been there."
Oh well. I guess not even a national poltical convention or a huge protest march can put a damper on flirting.
September 1, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Posted August 31, 2004
Police cross a line
For a few scary moments, it looked like the situation would turn out very badly indeed.
I was standing with a group of young protesters on 33rd Street, near 6th Ave. The police, outfitted in riot gear, had formed a line across the street and were herding the crowd, now bunched up on the sidewalk, towards 5th Ave. But about eight motorcycle cops had used their bikes to form a barricade across the sidewalk behind us. The police in front had no idea what the police behind us were doing. In fact, despite all the pre-convention publicity of how effective the police are, and their ability to handle these kind of problems, they had no control over this situation which was largely of their own making.
Two possible scenarios crossed my mind. Either people would start falling on top of each other, with the very real likelihood of being injured, or one of us would be pushed into a police officer and his motorcycle, and all heck would break loose. Neither prospect looked promising. Finally, one of the police in the back row climbed on top of their bikes and waved their arms frantically to get the attention of the cops in the front. When they finally did, one cop from the front yelled "You OK?" The officer in the back shouted, somewhat annoyed, "Yes, we will be if you stop pushing them this way."
The mostly young crowd was afraid. You could sense it. But to their credit they did not yell obscenities at the police, or strike out in any way. In fact, all the aggression was coming from the other side, especially from the officer in charge. He pushed at the protesters two or three times, each time without any visible provocation.
I just have to pause here for a moment to make an observation. How many times have I seen an interview with an arrested protester who claimed he or she had done nothing to provoke the police. Almost always my reaction has been, "Yeah, sure." Only now I was seeing this very situation unfold in front of my eyes. These protesters, while certainly noisy, had obeyed police instructions down the entire length of the street. Now they were being treated as if they had gotten wildly out of control, but they hadn't. I know, because I was there.
I saw scenes like this repeated throughout Tuesday night. There would be an uneasy equilibrium between the police and the protesters, and then for some reason, the police would start arresting people. I saw it happen at Herald Square, and near 6th Ave and 29th St. In each case, the police seemed to lose control of the situation, often in ways that they were responsible for themselves.
For instance, there were so many police on so many streets in the midtown and downtown area that enormous crowds were created at the intersections. Often these crowds of tourists, delegates and locals were forced to stand for long periods of time on street corners as they waited to cross the street, as the police tried to control traffic. Protesters, seeing these big crowds, would move to join them. In turn, the police would start pushing people back, often people who had nothing to do with any protest. The mood at these corners was intense and uneasy. No wonder incidents were popping up all over the downtown area.
At some point the police would just start picking people out of the crowd and arresting them. From what I saw, there was often no rhyme or reason behind who they picked to arrest. While the arrests often seemed arbitrary and done in an overly aggressive fashion, I saw no overt acts of police brutality. While Tuesday night was chaotic, it wasn't Chicago 1968.
I'm also convinced that fatigue was a problem for the police. As I stood waiting for a traffic light near Times Square, I overheard one policewoman complaining to a colleauge that she had worked 23 hours in a row the day before. "They had me down for two shifts, 3 a.m. to 2 p.m., " she said in a loud voice. This fatigue was also obvious in the visible frustration that I saw several police captains and commanders exhibit as they tried to control unwieldy situations at crowded street corners.
Meanwhile, back on 33rd Street, the police had pushed us into a tight corner. We had no room to move in any direction – we were practically standing on top of each other. Then the police moved forward again, and started pulling people from the crowd, mostly other reporters. When one of the young people asked what was going on, the captain who had pushed a few of them around earlier told her she and her friends were being arrested for blocking the sidewalk.
Well, that's a neat trick, I said to myself, considering that the only reason we were blocking the sidewalk was that the police has pushed us there. "Just let us through and we'll leave," one young protester pleaded. One of the motorcycle cops snarled back, "Yeah, and where will you go?"
Finally, the police captain came to me. I kept quiet. I wanted to see where they would go. But he saw the convention credential in my shirt pocket. "Get him out of here," he said. As another officer grabbed me, I asked the captain, "Why are you arresting these people? What have they done wrong?" He ignored me. I continued to shout the question at the captain as I was pulled away. "Why are you guys doing this?" I said to the young officer who was pushing me away from the crowd. When we reached the end of the street, he let me go, smiled and said "Thank you sir."
In the background, I could hear the young people chanting "The world is watching."
Well, maybe not the world, but certainly this part of it was.
August 31, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Getting 'dinky'
Things were different today. You could feel it in the air and in the attitudes of the police, especially the ones standing in front of the numerous hotels in the midtown area of Manhattan, where many GOP delegates are staying for the RNC.
As I was walking into the media center just before lunch, a beefy police captain walked up to a couple of younger cops.
"If anything gets dinky around here, you just shut this place down right away," he told them in a stern voice. Then he nodded enthusiastically. "Any monkey business, OK, shut down." Then he walked up the street to deliver the message to the next gaggle of police.
Now I'm not sure what 'dinky' means, but it's obviously a word loaded with meaning for New York police. Word on the street was that this would be the day that trouble would come. Anarchists and similar groups, moving in small numbers, had said they would carry out numerous acts of civil disobedience to disrupt the convention.
But for one protestor, who stood on his own across the street from the Hilton Times Square hotel, ending violence was the main thing on his mind. Dave Robinson, from Brooklyn, stood alone quietly rotating a homemade placard that read "Sorry Texas! In two months we're going to send him home" on one side and "Why do more people have to die?" on the other.
Dave, who looked to be about my age, told me that he had chosen this location because the group he worked with had heard the Texas delegation was staying in the hotel. Well, I told him, I had been in the hotel the day before to go to a Monitor breakfast, and there sure were a lot of people there who talked with a twang. They weren't from Texas, though - try Mississippi and Louisana. He laughed and smiled.
I said I wanted to interview him, but he hesitated.
"It's not about me. It's about the kids serving in Iraq and Afghanistan." He was quiet for another moment. "The people who serve in our volunteer army aren't being treated fairly. They are really getting a raw deal. Somebody has got to stand up for them. I just want to remind these people [he gestured at the hotel across the street] about what's really happening."
He handed me a card with several e-mail addresses on it, including sites like anysodier.us and optruth.com, which offer a much different take on the experience of US soldiers in Iraq than presented by the US government or the mainstream media.
I asked if he felt like he was carrying on a lonely vigil. He guffawed and said, 'Come on Tom, you know there are lots of us around." He gestured to the rest of Times Square.
Dave had first gotten involved as an activist when he joined the Howard Dean campaign. After Mr. Dean dropped out, he got involved in voter registration efforts.
"I've registered both Democrats and Republicans, but to be honest, registering Republicans is not why I got involved. But I do it. Because they have a right to vote as well."
Dave tells me that he's worried about the lack of attention that Americans seem to be paying to what's going on in the world around them. He offered me a vivid description that showed how those from other nations seem more aware.
"If you get off the R train, on Bay Ridge Ave in Brooklyn, there's this diner. If you go into the diner, all day long people just watch the 24 lottery channel. That's what they watch. But if you go just a few blocks away, into the Arab community that lives there, you go into a cafe, and they are watching news all the time. I don't speak Arabic, but I know that the moment something happens, they all stop what they are doing and watch the TV. Now you tell me who is better informed."
I left Dave across the street from the Hilton rotating his sign. As I started to walk away, he waved and told me I could stop by later. "I'm not going anywhere."
That sounds like the right kind of 'dinky' to me.
August 31, 2004 | By Tom Regan | Permalink
What Rudy forgot to mention
Former New York mayor Rudy Guliani gave one of the best convention speeches in recent memory Monday night. While it was a tad long, and sometimes lacked focus, it was a great performance and far better than anything at the DNC.
I was watching the speech with a friend from New York, who leaned over to me at one point and remarked, "I see that Rudy really wants to run for governor or New York." Not so sure how current GOP governor George Pataki might feel about that.
But the biggest problem I had with the speech wasn't anything Mr. Guliani said, but what he did not say.
When he was going through his list of foreign nations (German and Italy in particular) that failed to respond properly to acts of terrorism in the 70s and 80s, which sent the "wrong message" to terrorists that they wouldn't face any real repercussions for their acts (which he says ultimately led to 9/11), he failed to mention perhaps the main incident of this kind - the terrorist bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in 1983 that killed 241 US Marines. (You could also mention the bombing of the US embassy in Beirut several months earlier that killed more than 60 people.)
Not only did the US fail to track down the people who committed the crime (it is suspected that Iranian-backed Hezbollah fighters did it), the bombing forced the US to pack up and leave Lebanon altogether - exactly what the terrorists wanted.
Here's how PBS's Frontline: Target America described the reaction of then President Ronald Reagan's team:
The president assembled his national security team to devise a plan of military action. The planned target was the Sheik Abdullah barracks in Baalbek, Lebanon, which housed Iranian Revolutionary Guards believed to be training Hezbollah fighters. Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger aborted the mission, reportedly because of his concerns that it would harm US relations with other Arab nations. Instead, President Reagan ordered the battleship USS New Jersey, stationed off the coast of Lebanon, to the hills near Beirut. The move was seen as largely ineffective. Four months after the Marine barracks bombing, US Marines were ordered to start pulling out of Lebanon.
On the same site, Bill Cowan, a former Marine Colonel who was sent by the Pentagon to discover who bombed the US embassy in Beirut in '83, says if the US had responded in the right way after the barracks bombing, the message would "still be out there."
I believe that if we used military force at that point [the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut, 1983], that we would have sent a message that would still be out there today: that when somebody strikes at all -- particularly when you kill 241 servicemen -- ... we're going to do something about it. To not do anything at all, I believe, sent a clear message to those terrorists back then, [and to] people who are terrorists now, and those in the future.
Then to make matters worse, the Reagan administration ended up conducting secret deals with the Iranian government (known, of course, as Iran-Contra) in an arms-for-hostages deal that surely must have given the Iranian government the idea that crime (or terrorism) does pay after all.
So while it's certainly fair game to go after the Italians and the Germans for not doing enough 20 years ago to fight terrorism, Rudy probably should have included the former Reagan administration in that spotlight. But I suppose it is a GOP convention after all, so criticism of the party's patron saint isn't likely to happen any time soon. After all, you don't ever hear many Democrats mention that it was FDR who took away the rights of Japanese-Americans and then imprsioned them, during World War II, do you?
But I just thought a little unexpurgated history would help.
August 31, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Posted August 30, 2004
Goin' down to the protest march
The one thing that they don't tell you about marching in a protest is how much standing around you do. When you watch the marches on TV, they seem so fluid, always in motion.
Nothing could be farther from the truth, as I discovered this afternoon when I joined (so to speak) a quite large group of New York-based protesters who marched from Union Square up to Madison Square Garden.
After all, I reasoned with myself, what better way to understand a protest march than to be in one? Well, not "in" it exactly. I didn't carry any signs, nor shout any slogans. So when you hear the "official" total of marchers given out by local officials (often a dubious number to start with in the first place) you can deduct one person - me. But I did march and it turned out to be quite an experience.
Union Square, the staging area for most of the protests this week, is located in the lower part of Manhattan, off 14th Street. The area has been used as a launch pad for free speech for more than 100 years now, so the sight of placards and banners and the sounds of whistles and drums that greeted me there had a bit of an historic feel.
The square also had the air of a carnival. I know that it's an overworked metaphor, but in this case, not an inappropriate one. Fresh off their rather spectacular march the day before, the people gathered in the square were raring to go. They wanted to march. Meanwhile, the more entrepreneurial members of their number were hawking anti-GOP paraphernalia by the bushload, if you'll pardon the pun. Buttons, stickers ... the most original items, in my opinion, were the "Bush smooshers" - fly swatters with the president's rather smooshed-looking face on them.
It was a diverse lot of protesters, to say the least. Most of them were advocates for better housing for New Yorkers, or a group promoting AIDS research. But there were also the more, well, fringe members of society in the crowd. Most of these sort tended to be on their own, although they did seem to have discovered the printing press with a vengenance. Almost all of them handed me flyers or pamplets, decrying everything from the war in Iraq to justice for the people of (fill in the blank).
Around noon, the protest started off with an air of excitment, and marchers flowed down 15th Street. They went about two blocks ... and stopped. And we stood there. Then we stood around a little bit more. Finally, we stood around again. For about half an hour by my measure. And it was hot. The organizers, however, had planned for this. Volunteers darted through the crowd giving out bottles of water, telling folks to "keep hydrated."
Strangely, no one would give me a bottle. I puzzled over this for a while until I figured it out. I was an older guy dressed in a tie, blue shirt, and khakis, wearing a Tampa Bay Lighting Stanley Cup Champs ball cap. In other words, I looked like I worked for the "man." This was confirmed for me by the rather long hostile glances I would occasionally receive from these volunteers, and the occasional marchers. To the young kid with enough tattoos and piercings to qualify him for the Guinness Book of World Records, I just looked "weird."
Finally I got tired of standing, and went and sat down on a curb next to Eileen Ryan of New York. Ms. Ryan, who was well into her 70s, told me she had missed Sunday's march. "I was in the hospital," she said with a smile. "And they wouldn't let me out until 2 p.m. So I came down today. "
She confessed to me that she didn't have much in common with the marchers, but that didn't matter to her one bit. "We have to stand together in these things, you know," she said with a smile. Then she and her older sister, Grace, stood up and returned to the marchers, as did I.
Around 1 p.m., the police finally opened the barricades and the marchers poured down 15th street, moving at a rather leisurely speed – like purposeful molasses on a hot day. In almost every building we passed, people flung open windows to watch. Many used digital cameras or video recorders to capture the moment.
One of my enduring memories of the march, in fact, will be the use of such technology. If I saw one digital video recorder, I saw a hundred. Every time I looked around, a marcher or bystander was panning the crowd with a hand-held camera. The police that lined the route were no exception, as they often jostled with the nimble media photographers and camera operators for the best positions to film the passing throngs. Police motives for filming, however, were probably a bit different than the media's.
Meanwhile, organizers darted in and out of the crowd using cell phones and phones with walkie-talkie-like abilities to keep the march focused and organized. It occured to me that without this technology, there was a very good chance that this type of march would have been disorganized and potentially dangerous. But the instant communication between those at the front and those at the back made all the difference.
As I marched along, I learned several important lessons.
First, even with a really motivated crowd, it's hard to maintain a real good chant. In fact, I think it's high time that someone just wrote a whole new batch of them. The "hey, hey, ho, ho" stuff really has to go. Now and then someone would strike up a chant, they would be joined by a throng of voices for about two minutes, and then it would ebb like a wave running away from a shore during low tide.
Second, it's really hard to get a New York city police officer to smile for any reason. As the marchers turned up 8th Ave., the police were planted every five feet for about 20 city blocks. That's a lot of police. They all had their little black bowling bags with their riots helmets beside them. And few of them were in a good mood after standing in the 85-degree weather for several hours.
Third, NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg deserves kudos for taking the chance to let people march, and Boston mayor Tom Menino looks even worse for stuffing all the demonstrators at the DNC into that gulag of a protest area near the Fleet Center. I cannot express adequately the difference between the two. The stalag in Boston was fenced off, under a set of elevated subway tracks. It was claustrophobic and soulless.
On the other hand, what I witnessed Monday was the best of what America is all about. People of various ethnic and religious backgrounds marching together in the world's largest city with a common purpose ... to exercise their right to free speech. Even if you didn't agree with a lot of what was being promulgated, it was an envigorating, uplifting event.
Once the group reached the end of the route at the corner of 8th Ave. and 31st St., I went back to the RNC media center, which is housed in the former Farley Post Office Building. Most of the crowd stayed put, turning their march into a demonstration, with music, dancing, and even a protest marching band with mock cheerleaders.
Goin' down to the protest turned out to be a very cool idea. Now if i could only get 'hey, hey, ho, ho" out of my head.
August 30, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
How many is 'a lot'?
When I turned on the TV this morning to catch the news, I confess I was a bit stunned when I heard the "official count" of Sunday's march in New York.
The local CBS station was quoting police officials and the Associated Press, who said that around 110,000 people were a part of the process that streamed past Madison Square Gardens for four and one-half hours.
What! I'm sorry, but that figure is way, way, way too small. I've seen several large marches in Washington, where the official count was 250,000 or more and this march was every bit the equal of those earlier demonstrations.
So I asked a few of the people covering the convention here in New York their thoughts on the size of the rowd. To a person, they scoffed at the lower figure. Monitor photographer Andy Nelson, who was in the thick of the crowd, said it was easily 200,000. One police officer outside the hall said he has heard as many as 400,000.
Organizers put the total at half a million. Well, I'm not sure of that figure either. But I will tell you one thing – it was A LOT of people.
August 30, 2004 in Science | By Tom Regan | Permalink
Posted August 29, 2004
Nice day for a protest
Back in the late 1970s and 80s, a whole rash of flims featured New York City (or a nameless city that sure seemed a lot like New York) as a quasi-police state. Escape from New York with Kurt Russell comes to mind.
On this hot, humid day in New York City, just before noon, you could stand in the middle of 7th Avenue and think you were in one of those old films.
The police presence was overwhelming. There were police on horses, on motorcycles, on bicycles, in cars, in trucks, on foot. Overhead, several police helicopters, flying just above the horizon of skyscrapers near Madison Square Garden, filled the often-empty canyon streets with an ominous, echoing "thud, thud, thud, thud."
Every street corner, it seemed, was occupied by law enforcement. Police stood in the front doors of every major store and hotel from Times Square to the Garden. Several were guarding the McDonalds on 42 St., no doubt a much-sought-after posting.
Near the Port Authority, several dozen policemen and women stood clutching riot helmets in one hand and long wooden riot sticks in the other hand. It seemed like they tried to look relaxed, but actually might have felt a little nervous. No one, after all, was quite sure how all this would turn out.
Then the protesters came. And came. And came, and came, and came, and came. Not just in the tens of thousands, it seemed, but it the hundreds of thousands. The protesters, organized by United for Peace and Justice, marched - peacefully for the most part - past the Garden, site of the convention, for more than four hours Sunday. While most were dressed in T-shirts and shorts, they seemed undeterred by the heat. The march's momentum was only broken around 3 p.m. when someone set fire to a large paper-mache beast that was supposed to represent the evils of the Bush administration. The fire was extinguished, the street cleared, and the crowd surge forward once again.
They decried their favorite targets: the Bush administration, the war in Iraq, Halliburton ... and Fox News. "Bush Lies, Who Dies?" was the most common placard, although many carried homemade signs ("I don't hate Bush, but we disagreely strongly.") The mood was one of controlled, but purposeful, anger.
Just one block away from the marchers, hundreds of police officers stood together in large groups near buses, waiting for trouble. They guzzled bottle after bottle of water to take the edge off the heat, brought to them by small yellow police vehicles. Many clutched small black bags, that looked like something in which you would carry a bowling ball. Closer examination reveled helmets and pepper spray. An older African-American woman stood watching them. "I know they have to be here, but it just doesn't feel right, no, it sure doesn't," she said to no one in particular.
For the most part, what I saw of the interaction between protesters and police was almost professional. There seemed to be an understanding between the two that they were just there to do their jobs. Pehaps this was best illustrated when about three dozen cyclists staged a sit-down protest on 38th St., away from the main group. They lay in the road, for the most part quietly, while police officers milled about, putting their bikes on a truck, and then taking the mostly young group members away, one by one, to a waiting police bus.
But there seemed to be little animosity between the two groups. When one woman complained that her plastic handcuffs were too tight, an officer adjusted them immediately, then helped her sit back down. Other members of the cyclist group joked with the crowd of media people who had gathered, demanding that they be paid for having their pictures taken.
Fifty-three people were arrested during the entire march (which is an incredibly small number number when you consider the number of people who marched), and only in one situation that I'm aware of, in front of the Garden, did tempers flare.
Some people protested the protesters: There were the signs held up proclaiming the protesters to be communists. Anti-abortion activists showed. One man planted himself just off Time Square, carrying a sign proclaiming that he was a New Yorker for Bush. He passed his time posing for pictures with Republican delegates, who seemed to be pleased to find someone who actually liked the president.
As the day wound down, protesters drifted away from Union Square, the end of the march. Almost all were pleased. "It was a great day," said Angela Simons from New Jersey. She had come with her entire family. "I'm tired but happy to make my voice heard."
For some, the march was just another tourist attraction in the world's biggest city. A group of young students from India encourged one of their group to haul a protest sign out of a garbage can and pose for a picture. She grinned and meekly waved the sign back and forth. They took turns staging their "protest" and snapping shots that would find their way back to their families on the other side of the world.
By 4:30 in the afternoon, the street in front of the Garden was quiet, but filled with protest signs, water bottles, and torn banners. Police were more noticably relaxed and seemed relieved that they weren't required to make a show of force.
Tomorrow, the protests begin again. This time Disabled Veterans and Billionaires for Bush. No doubt the police are hoping that those protests are as violence-free as this one today.
August 29, 2004 in Republican National Convention | By Tom Regan | Permalink
|